Tax legislative lingo: Underbrush

Back when I worked for Congress, 1982-90, tax legislation — or negotiations in Congressional Conference Committee — often started with what staff called “underbrush” — pieces of a bill that everyone could agree on.  “Everyone” meant six or seven groups:  majority and minority staffs of Ways and Means in the House and Finance in the Senate (that’s four), Joint Tax Committee staff (that’s five), and the Executive Branch, maybe Treasury and the IRS (that’s seven) or maybe Treasury spoke for the IRS (that’s just six).

Underbrush, as I recall, tended to start with technical corrections to the most recent big bill.  Underbrush expanded to include corrections to older bills, then to tax provisions that for whatever reason were noncontroversial.  As the Senate and House negotiated, Joint Tax staff would print spreadsheets listing provisions each side proposed.  When each side had identical provisions, those provisions, both corrections to old legislation and New Starters, usually became underbrush — agreed as part of the new package, and not needing further negotiation.  Usually, but not always.

Advertisements

Author: patoglesby

From 1982 to 1990, I worked in tax policy for Committees of the United States Congress. In recent years, I was Adjunct Lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill's Business School and then Adjunct Professor at its Law School.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s