Salient marijuana taxes

Here’s an update about NYT story on Colorado bundling.

++++++++++

Salient taxes — obvious to the consumer — cut marijuana consumption. Hidden taxes, by contrast, boost revenue. — NPR.

A sales tax added on at the end tends to get ignored by consumers, so it increases revenue.  Fine.  Let the economists say how stupid people are.  I’m sticking with my story.  Being a fan of the administrative efficiency that early collection at a choke point provides, I tend to overlook the biases that different tax structures bring to the consumer’s mind.

Significant retail taxes are crazy.  They allow pilferage and shoplifting (and Oops! Our truck got hijacked).  And bundling — hotel room $200 with open smoking downstairs.  What’s the tax there?

Advertisements

Author: patoglesby

From 1982 to 1990, I worked in tax policy for Committees of the United States Congress. In recent years, I was Adjunct Lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill's Business School and then Adjunct Professor at its Law School.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s