Taxes and bridges

One way to approach tax design is  like bridge building.  Anyone can do it.  Throw a plank over a creek and you’ve got yourself a bridge. Say marijuana consumers pay an extra X percent at the retail counter and you’ve got yourself a tax.

At a primitive level, that all works.  For a while.  But the plank won’t handle much traffic.  And with the marijuana tax, what happens when market forces drive prices (and taxes) down?  What about a free pot with pipe purchase?  And employee discounts?  And pilfered product — or product that’s “lost” in transit?  The way we tax alcohol and tobacco is not vulnerable to these problems.  More here:


Author: patoglesby

From 1982 to 1990, I worked in tax policy for Committees of the United States Congress. In recent years, I was Adjunct Lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill's Business School and then Adjunct Professor at its Law School.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s