Here’s a chart showing how Colorado has been converting the so-called 15-percent producer tax to a weight based tax:
||Bud tax in pounds
||Bud tax in ounces
||Bud tax in grams
||Trim tax in pounds
||Trim tax in ounces
||Trim tax in grams
2014 data used to create the 2015 rate comes from here: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/AverageMarketRate.pdf
2014 rate is explained here: https://newrevenue.org/2014/04/09/colorados-marijuana-tax-62-cents-per-gram-of-flowers/
Taxing “sin,” or something the state disapproves of, gives the state a financial incentive to increase it. This article or opinion piece from Alabama lists tobacco, alcohol, gambling, marijuana — and expands the list to include abortion. It contains this quote from Dave Barry:
“The only danger I see looming ahead is that the tobacco industry will get tired of serving as the bag person for the anti-smoking effort and actually quit selling cigarettes. In that case, the only way to keep the anti-tobacco money flowing in would be for the various governments to join forces with the legal community and sell cigarettes directly to the public out of post offices.” Continue reading “Sin tax theory”
Colorado’s current producer tax rates on marijuana – replacing the 15-percent tax in the Constitution – are the subject at https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/AverageMarketRate.pdf.
Bud is taxed at 66 cents a gram, trim at 12 cents a gram. Here’s how we get there: The “average market rate” — which substitutes for real prices — for bud is now $2,007 a pound; for trim, $364 a pound. Multiply those by 15 percent to get the tax per pound, divide by 453.592 to get the tax per gram. That’s a little higher than in 2014.
One way to approach tax design is like bridge building. Anyone can do it. Throw a plank over a creek and you’ve got yourself a bridge. Say marijuana consumers pay an extra X percent at the retail counter and you’ve got yourself a tax.
At a primitive level, that all works. For a while. But the plank won’t handle much traffic. And with the marijuana tax, what happens when market forces drive prices (and taxes) down? What about a free pot with pipe purchase? And employee discounts? And pilfered product — or product that’s “lost” in transit? The way we tax alcohol and tobacco is not vulnerable to these problems. More here: https://newrevenue.org/2015/04/28/weight-base-arbitrary/.
I got a call from 202 769 5226 (a DC number) from a woman who said her name was Shirley Carter of the IRS. Her accent was foreign. She furnished me Badge number 1090885.
There was a problem with my returns between 2008 and 2013, she said. (Note: The statute of limitations has run on some of those years.) “Why haven’t I seen anything in the mail?” I asked. You must have misplaced it, she told me.
I asked her to remail the material. She hung up. And hasn’t called back.
A call to that number yields only hold music.
The IRS does not call out of the blue.
Googling that number, I see this: http://www.whocalledme.com/PhoneNumber/202-769-5226 Continue reading “IRS impostor “Shirley Carter” calls on the phone”